Senedra reads NEC4, JCT and FIDIC. See how the accuracy is measured How the accuracy is measured

The commercial front door for every subcontract.

Senedra reads, registers, reviews and reports every term in your subcontract, so your commercial team runs the job from one record.

Book a demo

The commercial front door
for every subcontract.

Senedra reads, registers, reviews and reports every term in your subcontract. So your commercial team runs the job from one record instead of six inboxes.

NEC4JCTFIDICZ-clausesParticular ConditionsSchedules of amendmentsConstruction Act 1996Scheme for Construction ContractsScanned PDFs

From contract to final account.
One record.

Book a demo

How it works

The difference a record makes.

Read

Sixty pages, and the schedule of amendments behind them.

The subcontract as it was issued, however long it runs, together with whatever the other side attached at the back: Z-clauses, Particular Conditions, the lot. Scanned copies are read too.

Register

Every term that decides money, quoted and placed.

Payment, retention, notices, obligations, evidence and risk. Each one quoted word for word and cited to its clause and page, then rated, so the dangerous terms surface first instead of sitting unread on page fifty-one.

Review

Nothing reaches you unseen.

If the words cannot be found in the document, the item does not go in the register. Anything derived, date dependent or unusual is held in a review queue for a person to confirm before anyone acts on it.

Report

The file, ready for the final account.

One click turns the reviewed register into a branded pack: an editable Word report and a ten-tab Excel workbook, stamped DRAFT with the review caveat built in. Your team finishes it.

Reading the subcontract and every amendment behind it.

Payment mechanism …due 7 days after assessment… Y(UK)2 · p.12 CITED
Notice / time-bar …notify within 8 weeks… 61.3 · p.22 FLAGGED
Retention 3%, half released at completion… X16 · p.18 CITED

Each term quoted word for word, cited to clause and page.

Derived and date-dependent items wait for a person.

Word and Excel, stamped DRAFT. Your team finishes it.

Start to finish

One instruction,
from the site to the final account.

Instruction

Site instruction arrives by email

Forwarded to the project address
VO-014 · additional ductwork to Level 3

Capture

Recorded as a draft

VO-014 · CAPTURED
Evidence linked · photo, dayworks sheet

Clause

Placed against the term that governs it

“…notify within 8 weeks…”
Clause 61.3 · p.22

Visibility

The window is shown, not managed

Notice window · 12 days remaining
Your QS owns the decision

Applied

What you applied for

Application 07 · £96,400

Certified

What came back

Certificate 07 · £88,150

Difference

The gap, stated plainly

£8,250 not explained
From your own records

Position

Carried into the monthly review

Shown against the register
No entitlement is asserted

Term

The clause that bars the claim

“…if the Subcontractor does not notify within 8 weeks…”

Flag

Raised on the read

Notice / time-bar · FLAGGED

Second read

Re-checked before you see it

A second reader confirms the flag
False alarms caught here

Register

Sitting in the record, cited

61.3 · p.22 · CAUGHT

Illustrative. The figures are the product’s own example, not a real job.

The register

If it isn’t in the contract, it isn’t in the register.

Payment mechanism …due 7 days after assessment… Y(UK)2 · p.12 CITED
Notice / time-bar …notify within 8 weeks… 61.3 · p.22 FLAGGED
Retention 3%, half released at completion… X16 · p.18 CITED

These rows are illustrative. Nothing here comes from a real contract.

Most contract tools read faster. That was never the problem.

A subcontract is not hard to read. It is hard to keep. The terms that decide whether you get paid are spread over sixty pages and a schedule of amendments, and by the time the job is running they live in one person’s memory, three inboxes and a spreadsheet nobody has opened since February. Reading it faster does not change that.

Senedra was built the other way round. It takes the contract apart once, quotes every term that touches money word for word, cites it to its clause and page, and keeps that record as the job moves. When the instruction lands on site, the clause that governs it is already there. Nothing has to be remembered, and nothing has to be found again at the final account.

Accuracy

How we check it,
rather than how we describe it.

0%

Precision

on our own labelled test set

0

Contract families

NEC4, JCT, FIDIC and AIA, marked up by hand

0

Tabs

in the Excel workbook it writes

0%

Of register lines

quoted and cited to clause and page

These are our own test contracts, not customer results. Contracts across NEC4, JCT, FIDIC and AIA are marked up by hand first, and that becomes the answer sheet the engine is measured against on every change. Senedra has no published customer outcomes because it has not had customers long enough to have any.

Security

Your contract stays yours.

Documents are processed and stored in the UK and EU, encrypted in transit and at rest, and never used to train any model. You can ask for them to be deleted at any time, and the specifics are written into the engagement letter you sign.

It works where the job already lives.

Nothing new to adopt. The contract arrives as a PDF and the file leaves as Word and Excel.

PDF Scans Word Excel Email Register

Book a demo

See it on your own contract.

Send a contract, closed job or live. We read it and you see your own register. No pitch, no commitment.

Book a demo

More to explore